On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 18:28:47 -0400, "Art S. Kagel"
<kagel@bloomberg.net> wrote:
>ogj@tollpost.no wrote:
>> "IIUG Emailer" <emailer@iiug.org> writes:
>>
>>
>>>IUG Insider (Issue #60) June 2005
>>>
>>>Highlights: Logo contest, Cool SMI queries, IDS Training, Chat wit the lab, Calendar
>>
>>
>> [...] (snipped)
>
>As to you seeing all of your temp tables with both 0x0020 & 0x0040 set, I
>dunno. 0x0020 in ti_flags indicates a temp table automatically created by
>the engine to satisfy a join condition or to support a SCROLL CURSOR or
>REPEATABLE READ isolation query. If ti_flags contains the bit 0x0040 set
>that indicates a temp table created explicitely by a user with CREATE TEMP
>TABLE... or SELECT...INTO TEMP... Then final value, 0x4000, is only
>described as a special function temp table which does not require bitmap
>maintenance. Anyone out there know why 'yvind is seeing combinations of
>these flags set? John? Madison?
I'm not sure . . . I'll have to dig a bit further. I've seen either
/ or, not combinations . . . .
>
>Also missing is an attribution. I believe Jake Solomon first showed a
>version of this one to me.
>
>Art S. Kagel