Re: DataTransfer to SQL Server
Posted in 2000
---- you wrote: > why downgrade to an inferior product like SQL Server 7.0 - it is like a car > with fuzzy dice (fuzzy GUIs) hanging on the rear-view mirror. The fuzzy dice > might be photogenic, but they do not make up for the loss of horse-power under > the hood. And if you get into an o-o swamp, the fuzzy dice will not keep the > vehicle afloat, you really need an amphibious vehicle like Informix9. And if > you stop into a warehouse, you really need something like an Informix7 or 8 > instead of SQL Server 7.0. You need to lay off that shit for a while Dude! It's frying your brain. Perhaps they downgraded for cost reasons. Some companies even put cost of ownership above continuity of service in their priorities. AB ---------------------------------------------------------------- Get your free email from AltaVista at http://altavista.iname.com