RE: RFC - Survey (not sales!)

Data Protection Basically, it's what you are allowed to do with personal information stored (or, more to the point) what you are not allowed to do with it. (From your response Brett, I assume you know that, but my presumption that interested readers would follow that is - presumptuous.) If, as you suggest, the information is anonymous, then I believe you should be OK. Cheers Robert Stuart P.S. Belief is not knowing. -----Original Message----- From: Brett Geer [mailto:brett@brabys.co.za] Sent: 20 December 2000 09:06 To: Robert Stuart Cc: informix-list Subject: Re: RFC - Survey (not sales!) DP Rules? I don't follow. basically what I was proposing was a simple stat on what sort of people lurk on this list or randomly rtfm users brett > Interesting, but how does this map to European DP rules? > (OC, and Watson, Paul - your input might be useful here) > > >From a practical viewpoint, the www.deja.com archive may be a useful > starting point. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brett Geer [mailto:brett@brabys.co.za] > Sent: 20 December 2000 06:26 > To: informix-list > Subject: RFC - Survey (not sales!) > > Morning All, > > (or evening depending on the state of your server and your feed). > > Just lastnight it occurred to me that we see a wide variety of > posts comming in but very few people who answer most of the > questions. > > While watching a horror movie (not a m$ advert) it dawned on > me that there must be a fair readership of the c.d.i group, be it > via usenet or the iiug list. > > It would be interesting to see a stat on the people we have on the > list, location, type of feed, macho level of server that sort > of thing. > > Anyone else? > > brett > --