Re: autoincremental field ?? Bug

From: "Mark D. Stock" <mdstock@mydas.freeserve.co.uk> > >Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > > > > From: "COOPER, Joseph" <Joseph.COOPER@sema.co.uk> > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Obnoxio The Clown [mailto:obnoxio@hotmail.com] > > > > >I have tried this so many times that now I'm at about 700. > > > > > > > > Why are you trying to do this? Rule number 17 is that your > > > > keys should have no meaning. So why do you care if > > > > there's a gap? > > > > > >Rule No 16. The client is always right. > > > > NO. The client is always the client, he's definitely not always right. > >Unless you expect the client to pay you. Eh? What does "pay" mean, then? Anyway, that's a daft argument. If the client was always right, what have you been doing on all your performance tuning gigs, then? :-) ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com