Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
A light-hearted exchange under the Page Size thread. Christine Normile joked the acquisition was a plot by the AIX team to push customers to DB2 and bigger hardware. Double Echo said IBM staff told him hardware sales of VM-partitioned Power systems undercut per-CPU software pricing, and wondered whether Power stays relevant against x86. scottishpoet recalled Sun refusing to help in a competitive bid. No technical question.
Auto-generated by Claude from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Does that mean that the acquisition was really an evil plot by the
pSeries (AIX) team to drive Informix customers to DB2 and bigger
hardware?
On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:36 AM, scottishpoet wrote:
> "they noticed a 25% reduction in CPU usage which means
> they can live on that server host for longer through DB growth before
> having
> to spend $$ on a bigger faster system"
>
> And there in lies the reason hardware manaufacturers hate informix
>
> _______________________________________________
> Informix-list mailing list
> Informix-list@iiug.org
> http://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list
scottishpoet wrote:
> well it would go a long way to explaining ongoing hidden agenda IBM has
>
It's actually more true that you would imagine. I was told by more than one person from IBM that
the software people have to constantly deal with not only Informix but DB2 pricing-by-the-CPU and
having the hardware people muck up their deals.
DB2/Informix are sold by the CPU, thus the more the merrier, till they have the hardware people
come in and chat about using 1/10 of a CPU for a VM. So the hardware people totally sink the
nice big juicy CPU-based software sale by touting the need for fewer CPUs.
What I'm really curious about is how many Power[5-6-7-...] systems are really being sold, and
being sold with AIX as opposed to Linux. Power is supposed to be the ultimate VM environment
but I have heard hardly anything over the past year about how great it is. Instead you hear
a lot about XEN, VMware, and other virtual machines on Linux. Even Opteron is still the hot
topic, and x86 Quad Core ( http://news.com.com/2100-1006_3-6038148.htmlhttp://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1826663,00.asp ). So the question is Power even
going to be relevant with cheaper x86 on the horizon. 2007 is going to get interesting with
the big push into better VM's.
it was said in jest but i have been in competitive sales situations
where Sun all but refused to work with me because they could sell loads
more tin if they supported an Oracle bid!
Your privacy choices
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.