ER Question

Hi, I have been using Ignore for conflict resolution with Enterprise Replication on IDS 9.2. I have a new project starting and I want to set it up using timestamp instead. Anybody have any stories on using timestamp, both good and bad? Any info you can provide wil be great. Thanks. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.

Hi, mdelerme@my-deja.com wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been using Ignore for conflict resolution with Enterprise > Replication on IDS 9.2. I have a new project starting and I want to set > it up using timestamp instead. Anybody have any stories on using > timestamp, both good and bad? Any info you can provide wil be great. > Thanks. Timestamp is the default conflict resolution and will work fine. But you should notice that a) you have add 2 columns to each table which will participate with ER alter table add crcols; b) your row size grows by 8 byte, cause of that c) you will get shadow tables, which will hold your deleted rows Wile