ESQL executable size
Posted in 1999
Topics: Connectivity: ESQL/C, 4GL & Embedded SQL, Platform-Specific Issues
Hi, all! I try to find out what else will impact the executable size besides the ESQL version and HP OS version. Currently we have two servers, both of which have the same OS version(HP-UX B.10.20) and Informix version(7.30.UC6) running them. However, when I tried to compile the same set of source using the same make file on both server, the executable size came out diffrently. I am wondering what else could make it different. Does anyone know? Please email your response to: calvin.chen@telops.gte.com Thanks!
In article <7u7vdn$734$1@news.gte.com>, Calvin Chen <calvin.chen@telops.gte.com> writes >Hi, all! > >I try to find out what else will impact the executable size besides the ESQL >version and HP OS version. Currently we have two servers, both of which have >the same OS version(HP-UX B.10.20) and Informix version(7.30.UC6) running >them. However, when I tried to compile the same set of source using the same >make file on both server, the executable size came out diffrently. I am >wondering what else could make it different. > >Does anyone know? Please email your response to: calvin.chen@telops.gte.com > C compiler version? OS patches? >Thanks! > > -- David Williams
Hello, David! Should C compiler version be the same as INFORMIX/ESQL version, which is 7.30.UC6? As for the OS patches, our system admin told us that they are the same on both servers. Any idea? Do you know what command to use to check the C comipler version and OS patches version? Thanks, Calvin David Williams <djw@smooth1.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:zXsS6HAHXPC4Eweg@smooth1.demon.co.uk... > In article <7u7vdn$734$1@news.gte.com>, Calvin Chen > <calvin.chen@telops.gte.com> writes > >Hi, all! > > > >I try to find out what else will impact the executable size besides the ESQL > >version and HP OS version. Currently we have two servers, both of which have > >the same OS version(HP-UX B.10.20) and Informix version(7.30.UC6) running > >them. However, when I tried to compile the same set of source using the same > >make file on both server, the executable size came out diffrently. I am > >wondering what else could make it different. > > > >Does anyone know? Please email your response to: calvin.chen@telops.gte.com > > > C compiler version? > OS patches? > > >Thanks! > > > > > > -- > David Williams