Re: any good programming editors for ESQL and Unix
From: hanhwe_kim@yahoo.com > >here is a question for people doing ESQL/C on Unix. > >are there any good programming editors/environments for writing >ESQL/C source code on Unix. We have Hp Unix and are using ><cringe> vi right now. We have been meaning to modernize >but have not gotten around to shopping. > >any ideas on good editors and other static source code analysis >tools such as cross-reference generators designed with ESQL/C in >mind? Or perhaps some macro packages that can be used with >text editors? Why is it that people come on this newsgroup to troll? First we have a bunch of Oracle retards telling us that we should be using that junk, now we have someone telling us that vi is not the best editor in the world. :0) Kim -- learn to use it. You will love it after the first time the recovery or the undo buffers save your butt. It took me a couple of weeks to get proficient, and I've never looked back. I even have vi on my NT and Win98 boxes. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> writes: > From: hanhwe_kim@yahoo.com > > > >here is a question for people doing ESQL/C on Unix. > > > >are there any good programming editors/environments for writing > >ESQL/C source code on Unix. We have Hp Unix and are using > ><cringe> vi right now. We have been meaning to modernize > >but have not gotten around to shopping. > > > >any ideas on good editors and other static source code analysis > >tools such as cross-reference generators designed with ESQL/C in > >mind? Or perhaps some macro packages that can be used with > >text editors? > > Why is it that people come on this newsgroup to troll? First we have a bunch > of Oracle retards telling us that we should be using that junk, now we have > someone telling us that vi is not the best editor in the world. :0) It's not:) You might argue that Emacs is the size of Oracle, but it probably the best thing out there (no, I won't call it an editor;) > Kim -- learn to use it. Buy some Prozac when your at it... >You will love it after the first time the recovery > or the undo buffers save your butt. You'll need them... > It took me a couple of weeks to get > proficient, and I've never looked back. I even have vi on my NT and Win98 > boxes. The only good argument against emacs is share size (disk and memory), but who cares these days? Thomas (who dislikes vim less than vi)
Obnoxio The Clown schrieb: > From: hanhwe_kim@yahoo.com > > > >here is a question for people doing ESQL/C on Unix. > > > >are there any good programming editors/environments for writing > >ESQL/C source code on Unix. We have Hp Unix and are using > ><cringe> vi right now. We have been meaning to modernize > >but have not gotten around to shopping. > > > >any ideas on good editors and other static source code analysis > >tools such as cross-reference generators designed with ESQL/C in > >mind? Or perhaps some macro packages that can be used with > >text editors? > > Why is it that people come on this newsgroup to troll? First we have a bunch > of Oracle retards telling us that we should be using that junk, now we have > someone telling us that vi is not the best editor in the world. :0) > > Kim -- learn to use it. You will love it after the first time the recovery > or the undo buffers save your butt. It took me a couple of weeks to get > proficient, and I've never looked back. I even have vi on my NT and Win98 > boxes. Hi Clown, vi is an editor. But what Kim looks for is a development workbench. -- Peter Dzvonyar SAP-Consultant R/3 BC _______________________________________________________________ email: Peter.Dzvonyar@ops.de p.dzvonyar@t-online.de _______________________________________________________________