Re: (2) Poor Performance with 7.31.uc6
Posted in 2000
Andy Lennard wrote:
>
> In article <8lq76b$hml$1@news.xmission.com>, Obnoxio The Clown
> <obnoxio@hotmail.com> writes
> >
> >From: "Mark D. Stock" <mdstock@mydas.freeserve.co.uk>
> >>
> >>Obnoxio The Clown wrote:
> >> >
> >> > From: "Mark D. Stock" <mdstock@mydas.freeserve.co.uk>
> >> > >
> >> > >Andy Lennard wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Is there a utility to rebuild indexes? or is dbschema/dbaccess the
> >>best?
> >> > >
> >> > >I would simply disable them, then enable them. You can do all indexes
> >>on
> >> > >a table with a single command.
> >> >
> >> > Fsck!!! You've been reading the manual again, haven't you? :-)
> >>
> >>Is that in the manual?! Well, I'm NOT as dumb as you thought! ;-)
> >
> >You'd be furniture if you were. :-)
> >
> >Andy, my script is still useful if you want to change fragmentation or
> >placement. So there. :-)
>
> And it's certainly not clear from my reading of the manual that enabling
> the index completely rebuilds it.
>
> It certainly does something (unless there's a big sleep in there
> somewhere), but does it do enough to resolve the problem that we're
> (I'm!) trying to sort out?
Yes, it does rebuild your indexes. However, whether that solves your
original problem I cannot say. I thought your original problem was a bug
to do with index page priorities, and I thought the fix was to upgrade.
But as ever, I could be wrong.
Cheers,
--
Mark.
+----------------------------------------------------------+-----------+
| Mark D. Stock mailto:mdstock@mydas.freeserve.co.uk |//////// /|
| http://www.informix.com http://www.informixhandbook.com |///// / //|
| http://www.iiug.org +-----------------------------------+//// / ///|
| |This email will self-destruct in |/// / ////|
| |10 sec. If you received this email |// / /////|
| |in error, sorry about the mess. |/ ////////|
+----------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+