graeme@pyramid.com (Graeme Sargent) wrote:
>DBA Resources (dbaresrc@xmission.xmission.com) wrote:
>: M. Livenspargar (michaell@sonic.net) wrote:
>: >The Hardware choices: HP-9000 and RS/6000
>
>: >The Database choices: Informix, Sybase, Oracle
>
>: Not having extensive financial resources myself, I tend to look at
what the
>: big "wins" are what combination of products these companies are
using. All
>: three DB vendors will continue to win accounts but the momentum is
swinging
>: to Informix 'cause it just plain *works* and has the architecture to
continue
>: blowing the doors off Sybase and Oracle.
>
>: As far as hardware is concerned, again I go to the big wins and HP is
taking
>: them all.
>
>That's odd! Where do our big wins appear from then?
>
>We only ever lose a race to HP when the customer either can't afford,
or
>doesn't need to buy the best.
>
>Unfortunately, they get to start a lot more races than we do.
>
>Like the one above.
>
>They say they want the best. But they don't bother to evaluate the
>best.
>
I'm sorry if the title of my post was misleading - it should have more
completely read "Best Hardware/Database Combo Given the Following
Choices" (see earlier followup "not all decisions are technical"). In
the end, however, we'll probably go out to bid. A competitive
price/performance bid will certainly be evaluated.
M. Livenspargar