OT: Re: oops

Most discussions in most groups are rude and lack subtleness. Everyone tries to make a point without really understanding the counterpart's one, which is, in my view, a ridiculous way to approach dialectics. This group is different. Here we can enjoy really good arguments and wow, people *do* read them and think them well before responding. That's "wordsmanship". -- Juan de Villeros On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:08:39 -0500, June C. Hunt <june_c_hunt@hotmail.com> wrote: > Andrew Hamm wrote: > >[...] > > Well I hope the misunderstanding of my misunderstanding of your name is > > now cleared up. The internet offers so many clever witty anonymous > > handles, it's sometimes hard to distinguish the straight from the crooked. > [...] > > > > Now I really must go home. We return you to your normal services. Oh yeah, > > apologies too. > > Thank you. Though I do really wish that you had asked me if the name was > real. FWIW, way back when, I did a Google search on 'June Hunt'. Found a > couple of references to a woman who was supposed to be married to Mike. > (Put the name together, if you haven't already done so.) You'll see why I > added my middle initial. I wanted to be sure to distinguish myself from > that other June Hunt. Of course, I had no idea that I was setting myself up > for darn near the same thing. I suppose I should thank you for the > education. Though I now need to decide if I should keep the middle initial. > Maybe you've got the right idea. Maybe I'll just completely change my name. > Now - to find a "safe" one... > > June > > -- The truth will set you free. But it will first piss you off. sending to informix-list