Re: Run your eyes over this onstat -p listing

Greg, Give us a hint about what doesn't look right. At first glance, it looks like a tuning issue. Things are working, and not all that bad, but could stand for improvement. Also some waiting for locks, but if you have a lot of users that might be OK. What's your message log look like. What does onstat -F say? etc. etc. Yours, Nick At 11:39 PM 8/10/98 +1000, Greg McGregor wrote: >All, > >Attached is a copy of an onstat -p losting sent to me by a o/s team who I deal >with on a daily basis. This just does not look right. I have my ideas but I would like to know if someone else could run their eyes over it a provide some feedback. ((Checkpoint values)) > > > >TIA > > >Greg McGregor >DBA (Database Bashers Anonymous) >gregm@starway.net.au >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >Artificial Intelligence is no competition for Natural Stupidity >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >Attachment Converted: "c:\\eudora\\attach\\ONSTAT_P.LOG" > ********************* Nick Nobbe NLS/BPH Library of Congress nnob@loc.gov