RE: Whatcha' wanta have?????
Not a technical problem thread. Rob Vorbroker asked whether IBM staff (Madison Pruet, Serge Rielau, Jonathan Leffler) would compile and repost the newsgroup's feature wishlist, and ideally reveal what's planned for IDS 9.5/9.6 as a marketing counter to Oracle and SQL Server. Pruet replied that he couldn't disclose future release contents since competitors read the group, but promised to condense the wishlist and repost it that week for confirmation. The rest is banter between Pruet and Oracle's Mark Townsend; no list or further outcome appears in the thread.
Auto-generated by DrWatson from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
So Madison, Serge or Jonathan; Are you going to compile a list of the great ideas and publish said back to this newsgroup list. Fantasy would be to have someone identify what will be in IDS v9.5 or v9.6. Certainly you could do that and scare the heck out of Orrible and sqealserver types (maybe even inspire the db2 group you work with to aim higher). Maybe it's a dream but that information makes a lot more sense to promote to the IIUG than white paper rhetoric. IMHO. Rob Vorbroker ===== Rob Vorbroker Phone: 513/336-8695 Vorbroker Consulting, Inc. Fax: 513/336-6812 www.vorbroker.com robv@vorbroker.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html sending to informix-list
Rob, I wish that we could list the things that we are putting in 9.5 and 9.6, but - well.... Mark Townsend would be seeing it as well. ;-) We will condense the list sometime this week and repost, just to confirm that we've understood correctly. "Rob Vorbroker" <rvorbroker@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:c0qron$6rf$1@terabinaries.xmission.com... > > So Madison, Serge or Jonathan; > > Are you going to compile a list of the great ideas and > publish said back to this newsgroup list. Fantasy > would be to have someone identify what will be in IDS > v9.5 or v9.6. Certainly you could do that and scare > the heck out of Orrible and sqealserver types (maybe > even inspire the db2 group you work with to aim > higher). > > Maybe it's a dream but that information makes a lot > more sense to promote to the IIUG than white paper > rhetoric. IMHO. > > Rob Vorbroker > > ===== > Rob Vorbroker Phone: 513/336-8695 > Vorbroker Consulting, Inc. Fax: 513/336-6812 > www.vorbroker.com robv@vorbroker.com > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html > sending to informix-list
Madison Pruet wrote: > I wish that we could list the things that we are putting in 9.5 and 9.6, > but - well.... Mark Townsend would be seeing it as well. ;-) Oh, I'm sure _Oracle_ has got all that stuff in it already. It's on the slides... -- "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ' dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule" - Coluche
Madison Pruet wrote: > > I wish that we could list the things that we are putting in 9.5 and 9.6, > but - well.... Mark Townsend would be seeing it as well. ;-) > Conceit in weakest bodies strongest works
"Mark Townsend" <markbtownsend@comcast.net> wrote in message news:4031902C.90405@comcast.net... > Madison Pruet wrote: > > > > I wish that we could list the things that we are putting in 9.5 and 9.6, > > but - well.... Mark Townsend would be seeing it as well. ;-) > > > > Conceit in weakest bodies strongest works > Humm --- guess that proves my point. ;-)
Madison Pruet wrote: >> >> Conceit in weakest bodies strongest works >> > > Humm --- guess that proves my point. ;-) I saw your point, but completely missed marks. Can someone translate?