RE: Diff between 9.21.UC3-1 and 9.21.HC3-1
It is documented in the Informix Guide to SQL Syntax and
the Informix FAQ at http://www.smooth1.demon.co.uk/ifaq06.htm#6.44:
6.44 What is a .FCx release of Online?
On 21st Oct 1998 com@netinfo-moldova.com (Octav Chiriac) wrote:-
The IDS 7.3 SQL Documentation (I don't remember is it the Guide or
Reference):
dbinfo('version','os') The operating system identifier within the versionstring:
T = Windows NT
U Unix 32 bit running on a 32-bit operating system
H UNIX 32 bit running on a 64-bit OS
F UNIX 64 bit running on a 64-bit OS
On 30th Oct 1998 tgirsch@iname.com (Thomas J. Girsch) wrote:-
The second letter goes:
A - Alpha Test version
B - Beta Test version
C - Customer Release (first)
Subsequent releases increment the letter to D, E, etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: allenj [mailto:allenj@ndr.com]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 07:32
To: informix-list@iiug.org
Subject: Diff between 9.21.UC3-1 and 9.21.HC3-1
This is probably an easy question.
Whats the difference between 9.21.UC3-1 and 9.21.HC3-1?
Is there a resource somewhere that explains what each character
(after the major and minor version numbers) mean?
thanks
Allen
Bernstein, Rick wrote in message <966kr7$ajk$1@news.xmission.com>... > >It is documented in the Informix Guide to SQL Syntax and >the Informix FAQ at http://www.smooth1.demon.co.uk/ifaq06.htm#6.44: > >T = Windows NT >U Unix 32 bit running on a 32-bit operating system >H UNIX 32 bit running on a 64-bit OS >F UNIX 64 bit running on a 64-bit OS T = Tragedy (talking about NT) U = UNIX H = Hybrid F = fat
In the year of Our Lord Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:41:31 +1100, "Andrew Hamm" <ahamm@sanderson.net.au> spake, saying: >Bernstein, Rick wrote in message <966kr7$ajk$1@news.xmission.com>... >> >>It is documented in the Informix Guide to SQL Syntax and >>the Informix FAQ at http://www.smooth1.demon.co.uk/ifaq06.htm#6.44: >> >>T = Windows NT >>U Unix 32 bit running on a 32-bit operating system >>H UNIX 32 bit running on a 64-bit OS >>F UNIX 64 bit running on a 64-bit OS > >T = Tragedy (talking about NT) >U = UNIX >H = Hybrid >F = fat Obnoxio 1.10.FC2 (don't ask what the C stands for... :-)
Obnoxio The Clown wrote in message <3a87cc69.8162296@130.133.1.4>... >In the year of Our Lord Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:41:31 +1100, "Andrew Hamm" ><ahamm@sanderson.net.au> spake, saying: > >>T = Tragedy (talking about NT) >>U = UNIX >>H = Hybrid >>F = fat > >Obnoxio 1.10.FC2 (don't ask what the C stands for... :-) I'm afraid to ask. So I won't.
"Andrew Hamm" <ahamm@sanderson.net.au> writes: > Obnoxio The Clown wrote in message <3a87cc69.8162296@130.133.1.4>... > >In the year of Our Lord Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:41:31 +1100, "Andrew Hamm" > ><ahamm@sanderson.net.au> spake, saying: > > > >>T = Tragedy (talking about NT) > >>U = UNIX > >>H = Hybrid > >>F = fat > > > >Obnoxio 1.10.FC2 (don't ask what the C stands for... :-) > > I'm afraid to ask. > So I won't. FC2 sounds like "f***ed-too" to me... Thomas
In the year of Our Lord 14 Feb 2001 10:49:29 +0100, Thomas Parsli <thomas.parsli@startsiden.no> spake, saying: >"Andrew Hamm" <ahamm@sanderson.net.au> writes: > >> Obnoxio The Clown wrote in message <3a87cc69.8162296@130.133.1.4>... >> >In the year of Our Lord Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:41:31 +1100, "Andrew Hamm" >> ><ahamm@sanderson.net.au> spake, saying: >> > >> >>T = Tragedy (talking about NT) >> >>U = UNIX >> >>H = Hybrid >> >>F = fat >> > >> >Obnoxio 1.10.FC2 (don't ask what the C stands for... :-) >> >> I'm afraid to ask. >> So I won't. > >FC2 sounds like "f***ed-too" to me... F = Fat C = Norwegian :-)