Re: Article on the Informix SPLIT
--- Impy <wyn441@my-deja.com> > wrote: >In article <8u8d59$sum$1@lyonesse.netcom.net.uk>, > "Neil Truby" <ntruby@netcomuk.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Impy <wlinden@stritch.edu> wrote in message >> news:8u7abn$11l4e$1@ID-51564.news.dfncis.de... >> > "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > news:8u78ou$27e$1@news.xmission.com... >> > > >> > > From: "ROBERT B VORBROKER" <ROBVORBROKER@prodigy.net> >> > > > >> > > >From one of our own, Joe Lumbley... >> > > > >> > > >http://www.devx.com/free/hotlinks/2000/ednote1101/ednote1101.asp >> > > > >> > > >Any thoughts... >> > > >> > > Fearlessly independent and sceptical. >> > Is that the verb form of scepter >> >> No, that would be "spectral", reflecting the correct spelling of >spectre. >> As it is, he's used the adjectival form of sceptic, also reflecting >the >> correct spelling. >Well, that'll teach me to bleach my hair all the way down to the roots >just prior to reading messages from across the pond! I didn't realize >there were two spellings of skeptic/sceptic. How very American of me... >Wynne Maybe they're trying to spell septic (the 'c' is silent, like in 'shedule' instead of 'schedule'). That could explain a lot. (sorry for the late response, but I've been sick) == "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next. _____________________________________________________________ Want a new web-based email account ? ---> http://www.firstlinux.net