Translating with DrWatson… this can take a few seconds the first time.
This is a genuine, complex translation. DrWatson protects commands, error codes, and log output while naturally translating the surrounding text. It’s translated once and saved.
John Carlson — — source: Usenet: comp.databases.informix
On 8 Dec 2006 20:57:35 -0800, elanleblanc@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>cfoughty@gmail.com wrote: I
>> thought when IBM acquired Informix they would kill it and move
>> everybody to UDB (DB2 for non-mainframe).
>
>That was Janet's grand plan. She apparently failed to consider that
>DB2 did not have the feature set of of IDS, did not perform as well as
>IDS in OLTP environments and was far more costly to administer. The
>Informix customers and business partners gave her an education before
>her retirement last year.
>>
>>So what is happenning to the future of Informix?
>
>While many IDS and DB2 customers share similar attributes and have
>similar needs, IDS has a much more diverse customer base and fills
>needs that DB2 (or Oracle) cannot. For that reason, IBM now has a
>multi-data server strategy. While the two data servers will share
>technology (and the engineering resources applicable) where it makes
>sense, IDS and DB2 will focus new technology on different market
>segments. IDS will target high performance OLTP and 'extreme'
>environments such as the need for an very small footprint or zero
>administration. DB2 will focus on XML and more general purpose
>environments.
>
Even though IDS can handle "general purpose" environments pretty well
. . .
JWC
We use strictly necessary cookies to make this site work. With your
consent we’d also use optional cookies for analytics and marketing. You can accept all,
reject all, or choose. Read our Cookie Policy.