RE: HDR & Logical Logs and Network failure
Posted in 2000
Topics: High Availability & Replication, Logging & Checkpoints
> -----Original Message----- > From: Pankaj [mailto:pankaj.patel@punks.demon.co.uk] > Hi , > > I have to apologise. I was pretty rushed and never actually thought of > posting the answer. And the answer is ........ :-)) > > > Pankaj > Art S. Kagel wrote in message <3963A806.4FFFCB72@bloomberg.net>... > >Didn't your mother teach you to share?! If you post that > answer the next > >poor slob will find it searching the archive. > > > >Art S. Kagel > > > >Pankaj wrote: > >> > >> Hi All , > >> > >> I have an answer from Informix. > >> Paul Watson # WF Software Ltd # Please don't Tel: +44 1436 674729 # confuse me with Fax: +44 1436 678693 # someone who cares www.wfsoftware.com # The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user(s) of the mail address(es) to which it was sent and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of it, or any part of it, in any form whatsoever, and any actions taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Hi All, Question 1 :- The basic answer is that as long as the logs are on the disk and do not re-cycle round , then when the network comes back up the servers sync. So if you use HDR make sure you have enough logical logs to take account of a network break. Question-2 : I am testing this scernario.I have had an answer , Basically the IDS asks for a tape from which to logically recover the log. Pankaj Watson Paul wrote in message <8k1v1t$46j$1@news.xmission.com>... > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pankaj [mailto:pankaj.patel@punks.demon.co.uk] >> Hi , >> >> I have to apologise. I was pretty rushed and never actually thought of >> posting the answer. > >And the answer is ........ :-)) > > >> >> >> Pankaj >> Art S. Kagel wrote in message <3963A806.4FFFCB72@bloomberg.net>... >> >Didn't your mother teach you to share?! If you post that >> answer the next >> >poor slob will find it searching the archive. >> > >> >Art S. Kagel >> > >> >Pankaj wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi All , >> >> >> >> I have an answer from Informix. >> >> > >Paul Watson # >WF Software Ltd # Please don't >Tel: +44 1436 674729 # confuse me with >Fax: +44 1436 678693 # someone who cares >www.wfsoftware.com # > > >The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary user(s) of the >mail address(es) to which it was sent and may be legally privileged. >If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution >or use of it, or any part of it, in any form whatsoever, and any actions >taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be >unlawful. > >