Re: On long checkpoints (again) under IDS 10

Hi. We don't have any replication on our servers. We migrate to IDS10 because 9.40 has just ended its life cycle, but we didn't realize IDS10 will expire soon also until we finished our tests, and we couldn't wait to test 11.5. On bufferpool config value, indeed we didn't change it, and we kept old-fashioned syntax. Might that be an issue on performance? No warning or message was delivered when we brought database online for the first time after migration or during this. Anyway, making those changes would be good, I'm going to do that also. Thanks for your answer Omar --- On Wed, 7/22/09, Russ <russclancy@aol.com> wrote: > From: Russ <russclancy@aol.com> > Subject: Re: On long checkpoints (again) under IDS 10 > To: "Omar Muñoz" <omarmun@yahoo.com> > Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2009, 9:58 AM > Quick Q: > > Are you running HDR or ER? > > Check the information center about v10 onconfig values: > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/idshelp/v10/index.jsp > Did you migrate all of the settings identically in the > BUFFERPOOL> onconfig varaibles? > Prior to v10, LRU_MIN_DIRTY, LRU_MAX_DIRTY, LRUS, BUFFERS, > etc were > used. > > Quick Q, why did you go to v10 when it goes End of Support > in 14 > months, Sept 30, 2009 > http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/support/lifecycle/ > > Hope this helps >