Re: Universal crap

Well, race related remarks are nice old way of fighting your opponents. Nothing new for Informix which lied to investors for a long time in order to cover its technical incompetence. As for you personally, you like jokes; wasn't it you who suggested that Microsoft might buy Informix? Why would most competent people in the industry buy shity crap? Boris Mike Segel wrote in message <3445FA90.728B@127.0.0.1>... >Alan Denney wrote: >> >> In article <01bcd9de$337e8cf0$fae916ac@b-dynin>, >> |dynin <bdynin@movil.com> wrote: >> |Looks like the only way for Informix to survive is to get rid of that >> |Universal shit and return to previous business. They spent some money on >> |that crap...well, everybody makes mistakes. >> |Boris >> >> Gee, why am I not surprised that "Boris" spoofed his address? > >Well, Col. Panic is posting as a *private citizen* :-) >(One way to ensure less wrath from Informix ;-) > >But you are right. >Lets look at Boris. (I always like Natasha better though) >Movil.com seems to be a vanity domain from Best.com somewhere in >the valley. (Unlike segel.com which is a *real* domain :-) > >Looking at deja news.... >From his spattering of posts, he appears to be a mild net kook. >So I'd ignore him. > >He's just trying to bait you. > >-Mikey >-- >#include <std_disclaimer.h> /* Mike Segel (MS385) */ >#include <No_Spam.h> >#ifdef OFFENDED_BY_CONTENT >The author takes no responsibility for this post. >Any resemblence to a coherent rational thought is purely coincidence. >-The Management. >#endif >***************************** >Due to AGIS's Refusal to Act Responsibly >We are blocking all of their domains at the packet level. >This block will exist until AGIS modifies their policies to >conform to existing RFCs and net community standards. > >We encourage all ISPs and domain holders to do the same. >*****************************