Re: RAID 1+0 versus RAID 0+1
I was at a site recently and was told that RAID10 doesn't work:-))), and neither did RAID01 Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > > From: wildpony <z1wildpony@hotmail.com> > > > >thank you..i have been trying to pound raid 10 into the sys admins head > >but i needed a few documented users opinions, > >but i guess all is at a deaf ear seeing that my hardware raid company can > >only > >do raid 5 or raid 01 so i guess i am just going to have to go with the raid > >0+1 > > As a side issue, I was at a site recently that actually experienced the > creeping data corruption issue that occurs because RAID 5 doesn't validate > parity. It was really ugly. > ________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com -- Paul Watson # WF Software Ltd # You are only young once Tel: +44 1436 674729 # but you can be immature Fax: +44 1436 678693 # for ever www.wfsoftware.com #
From: wildpony <z1wildpony@hotmail.com> > >thank you..i have been trying to pound raid 10 into the sys admins head >but i needed a few documented users opinions, >but i guess all is at a deaf ear seeing that my hardware raid company can >only >do raid 5 or raid 01 so i guess i am just going to have to go with the raid >0+1 As a side issue, I was at a site recently that actually experienced the creeping data corruption issue that occurs because RAID 5 doesn't validate parity. It was really ugly. ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > > From: wildpony <z1wildpony@hotmail.com> > > > >thank you..i have been trying to pound raid 10 into the sys admins head > >but i needed a few documented users opinions, > >but i guess all is at a deaf ear seeing that my hardware raid company can > >only > >do raid 5 or raid 01 so i guess i am just going to have to go with the raid > >0+1 > > As a side issue, I was at a site recently that actually experienced the > creeping data corruption issue that occurs because RAID 5 doesn't validate > parity. It was really ugly. Ain't it though! Art S. Kagel
Paul Watson wrote: > > I was at a site recently and was told that RAID10 doesn't work:-))), and > neither did RAID01 Ha ha ha.... Gefaw gefaw gefaw... Chuckle chuckle chuckle... Spit sputter ahew hew hew. OK, I'm all better now. Tell them to come look at my 150 RAID10 arrays comprising over 2000 drives! Works like a charm! Art S. Kagel > Obnoxio The Clown wrote: > > > > From: wildpony <z1wildpony@hotmail.com> > > > > > >thank you..i have been trying to pound raid 10 into the sys admins head > > >but i needed a few documented users opinions, > > >but i guess all is at a deaf ear seeing that my hardware raid company can > > >only > > >do raid 5 or raid 01 so i guess i am just going to have to go with the raid > > >0+1 > > > > As a side issue, I was at a site recently that actually experienced the > > creeping data corruption issue that occurs because RAID 5 doesn't validate > > parity. It was really ugly. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > -- > Paul Watson # > WF Software Ltd # You are only young once > Tel: +44 1436 674729 # but you can be immature > Fax: +44 1436 678693 # for ever > www.wfsoftware.com #