Error System Block
A user on IDS 11.70.FC8 reported a vague "Generic System Block" error; when asked for details, the online log showed assertion failures (MT_EX_OS, context mem) and "yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread" for an sqlexec thread, with an af file written. Art Kagel and Paul Watson identified it as a thread stack overflow and advised doubling the STACKSIZE onconfig parameter (noting UDRs/DataBlades often need more than the default). The user said STACKSIZE was already 512 and was told to raise it further; he thanked them, but no confirmation of the outcome is recorded.
Auto-generated by DrWatson from the posts below — may be imperfect; read the full thread.
Hello Someone knows why this error happens Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds Thanks for your attention -- Saludos Cordiales Rubén Dután Gerente APLEXT CIA. LTDA. Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC www.aplext.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
Where did you see this? Was there any kind of Informix SQL or ISAM error code? Art Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant ASK Database Management www.askdbmgt.com Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/ Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which I am associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities themselves. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ruben Dutan <ruben.dutan@aplext.com> wrote: > Hello > Someone knows why this error happens > > Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds > Thanks for your attention > -- > Saludos Cordiales > > Rubén Dután > Gerente > APLEXT CIA. LTDA. > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC > www.aplext.com > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > > ******************************************************************************* > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum. > > --001a11425fb4c1107305207df75e
Thanks Art
When execute "onstat -"
This is log message error
14:13:43 Assert Failed: Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
14:13:43 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
14:13:43 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
0x2f7fe76b0)
Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
File: mtex.c Line: 416
14:13:43 Action: Please notify IBM Informix Technical Support.
14:13:43 stack trace for pid 32162 written to /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:13:43 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:13:53 Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
14:13:53 Assert Failed: yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread
67767
14:13:53 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
14:13:53 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
0x2f7fe76b0)
Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
File: mt.c Line: 2546
14:13:53 stack trace for pid 32162 written to /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:13:53 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:14:03 Starting crash time check of:
14:14:03 1. memory block headers
14:14:03 2. stacks
14:14:03 Found bad stack; mt_stack address:c0b24da0
14:14:03 mt.c, line 2546, thread 67767, proc id 32162,
yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread 67767.
--
Saludos Cordiales
Rubén Dután
Gerente
APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
www.aplext.com
El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 09:11 -0400, Art Kagel escribió:
> Where did you see this? Was there any kind of Informix SQL or ISAM
> error
> code?
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> ASK Database Management
> www.askdbmgt.com
>
> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> opinions
> and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which
> I am
> associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
> those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
> entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> themselves.
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ruben Dutan <ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> > Someone knows why this error happens
> >
> > Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds
> > Thanks for your attention
> > --
> > Saludos Cordiales
> >
> > Rubn Dutn
> > Gerente
> > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > www.aplext.com
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --001a11425fb4c1107305207df75e
>
>
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Look at the messages about stack problems. Try increasing STACKSIZE double
and see if that will allow the engine to stay online. The default stack is
only 64K. I increase that to 128 at almost all of my clients.
Art
Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
ASK Database Management
www.askdbmgt.com
Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own opinions
and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which I am
associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities themselves.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ruben Dutan <ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Art
>
> When execute "onstat -"
>
> This is log message error
> 14:13:43 Assert Failed: Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
> 14:13:43 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> 14:13:43 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> 0x2f7fe76b0)
>
> Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
>
> File: mtex.c Line: 416
> 14:13:43 Action: Please notify IBM Informix Technical Support.
> 14:13:43 stack trace for pid 32162 written to /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> 14:13:43 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> 14:13:53 Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
> 14:13:53 Assert Failed: yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread
> 67767
> 14:13:53 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> 14:13:53 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> 0x2f7fe76b0)
>
> Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
>
> File: mt.c Line: 2546
> 14:13:53 stack trace for pid 32162 written to /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> 14:13:53 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> 14:14:03 Starting crash time check of:
> 14:14:03 1. memory block headers
> 14:14:03 2. stacks
> 14:14:03 Found bad stack; mt_stack address:c0b24da0
> 14:14:03 mt.c, line 2546, thread 67767, proc id 32162,
> yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread 67767.
>
> --
> Saludos Cordiales
>
> Rubén Dután
> Gerente
> APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> www.aplext.com
>
> El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 09:11 -0400, Art Kagel escribió:
> > Where did you see this? Was there any kind of Informix SQL or ISAM
> > error
> > code?
> >
> > Art
> >
> > Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> > ASK Database Management
> > www.askdbmgt.com
> >
> > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> >
> > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> > opinions
> > and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which
> > I am
> > associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
> > those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
> > entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> > themselves.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ruben Dutan <ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello
> > > Someone knows why this error happens
> > >
> > > Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds
> > > Thanks for your attention
> > > --
> > > Saludos Cordiales
> > >
> > > Rubn Dutn
> > > Gerente
> > > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > > www.aplext.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > *********************************************************************
> > **********
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --001a11425fb4c1107305207df75e
> >
> >
> > *********************************************************************
> > **********
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
--001a1141e4c81fe9a0052080aa9b
Double your stack size ?
<quote>
14:13:53 Assert Failed: yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread 67767
</quote>
The stack trace from the af is always useful, if you are using datablades
and/or custom UDRs the default stacksize is usually too low
Cheers
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: ids-bounces@iiug.org [mailto:ids-bounces@iiug.org] On Behalf Of Ruben
Dutan
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:22 AM
To: ids@iiug.org
Subject: Re: Error System Block [35805]
Thanks Art
When execute "onstat -"
This is log message error
14:13:43 Assert Failed: Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
14:13:43 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
14:13:43 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
0x2f7fe76b0)
Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
File: mtex.c Line: 416
14:13:43 Action: Please notify IBM Informix Technical Support.
14:13:43 stack trace for pid 32162 written to /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:13:43 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:13:53 Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
14:13:53 Assert Failed: yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread
67767
14:13:53 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
14:13:53 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
0x2f7fe76b0)
Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
File: mt.c Line: 2546
14:13:53 stack trace for pid 32162 written to /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:13:53 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
14:14:03 Starting crash time check of:
14:14:03 1. memory block headers
14:14:03 2. stacks
14:14:03 Found bad stack; mt_stack address:c0b24da0
14:14:03 mt.c, line 2546, thread 67767, proc id 32162,
yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread 67767.
--
Saludos Cordiales
Rubén Dután
Gerente
APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
www.aplext.com
El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 09:11 -0400, Art Kagel escribió:
> Where did you see this? Was there any kind of Informix SQL or ISAM
> error
> code?
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> ASK Database Management
> www.askdbmgt.com
>
> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> opinions
> and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which
> I am
> associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
> those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
> entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> themselves.
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ruben Dutan <ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> > Someone knows why this error happens
> >
> > Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds
> > Thanks for your attention
> > --
> > Saludos Cordiales
> >
> > Rubn Dutn
> > Gerente
> > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > www.aplext.com
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --001a11425fb4c1107305207df75e
>
>
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
****************************************************************************
***
Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
Thanks for you help but STACKSIZE is 512
You think that I must increase more
--
Saludos Cordiales
Rubén Dután
Gerente
APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
www.aplext.com
El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 12:24 -0400, Art Kagel escribió:
> Look at the messages about stack problems. Try increasing STACKSIZE
> double
> and see if that will allow the engine to stay online. The default
> stack is
> only 64K. I increase that to 128 at almost all of my clients.
>
> Art
>
> Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> ASK Database Management
> www.askdbmgt.com
>
> Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
>
> Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> opinions
> and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which
> I am
> associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
> those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
> entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> themselves.
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ruben Dutan <ruben.dutan@aplext.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Art
> >
> > When execute "onstat -"
> >
> > This is log message error
> > 14:13:43 Assert Failed: Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context:
> > mem
> > 14:13:43 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> > 14:13:43 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> > 0x2f7fe76b0)
> >
> > Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
> >
> > File: mtex.c Line: 416
> > 14:13:43 Action: Please notify IBM Informix Technical Support.
> > 14:13:43 stack trace for pid 32162 written to
> > /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > 14:13:43 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > 14:13:53 Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
> > 14:13:53 Assert Failed: yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread
> > 67767
> > 14:13:53 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> > 14:13:53 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> > 0x2f7fe76b0)
> >
> > Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
> >
> > File: mt.c Line: 2546
> > 14:13:53 stack trace for pid 32162 written to
> > /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > 14:13:53 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > 14:14:03 Starting crash time check of:
> > 14:14:03 1. memory block headers
> > 14:14:03 2. stacks
> > 14:14:03 Found bad stack; mt_stack address:c0b24da0
> > 14:14:03 mt.c, line 2546, thread 67767, proc id 32162,
> > yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread 67767.
> >
> > --
> > Saludos Cordiales
> >
> > Rubn Dutn
> > Gerente
> > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > www.aplext.com
> >
> > El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 09:11 -0400, Art Kagel escribi:
> > > Where did you see this? Was there any kind of Informix SQL or
> > > ISAM
> > > error
> > > code?
> > >
> > > Art
> > >
> > > Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> > > ASK Database Management
> > > www.askdbmgt.com
> > >
> > > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> > > opinions
> > > and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with
> > > which
> > > I am
> > > associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference.
> > > Neither do
> > > those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with
> > > any
> > > entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> > > themselves.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ruben Dutan <
> > > ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello
> > > > Someone knows why this error happens
> > > >
> > > > Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds
> > > > Thanks for your attention
> > > > --
> > > > Saludos Cordiales
> > > >
> > > > Rubn Dutn
> > > > Gerente
> > > > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > > > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > > > www.aplext.com
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > believed to be clean.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > *****************************************************************
> > > ****
> > > **********
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > > forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --001a11425fb4c1107305207df75e
> > >
> > >
> > > *****************************************************************
> > > ****
> > > **********
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --001a1141e4c81fe9a0052080aa9b
>
>
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Yes.
On Sep 24, 2015 4:08 PM, "Ruben Dutan" <ruben.dutan@aplext.com> wrote:
> Thanks for you help but STACKSIZE is 512
> You think that I must increase more
> --
> Saludos Cordiales
>
> Rubén Dután
> Gerente
> APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> www.aplext.com
>
> El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 12:24 -0400, Art Kagel escribió:
> > Look at the messages about stack problems. Try increasing STACKSIZE
> > double
> > and see if that will allow the engine to stay online. The default
> > stack is
> > only 64K. I increase that to 128 at almost all of my clients.
> >
> > Art
> >
> > Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> > ASK Database Management
> > www.askdbmgt.com
> >
> > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> >
> > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> > opinions
> > and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with which
> > I am
> > associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference. Neither do
> > those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with any
> > entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> > themselves.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ruben Dutan <ruben.dutan@aplext.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Art
> > >
> > > When execute "onstat -"
> > >
> > > This is log message error
> > > 14:13:43 Assert Failed: Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context:
> > > mem
> > > 14:13:43 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> > > 14:13:43 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> > > 0x2f7fe76b0)
> > >
> > > Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
> > >
> > > File: mtex.c Line: 416
> > > 14:13:43 Action: Please notify IBM Informix Technical Support.
> > > 14:13:43 stack trace for pid 32162 written to
> > > /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > 14:13:43 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > 14:13:53 Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
> > > 14:13:53 Assert Failed: yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread
> > > 67767
> > > 14:13:53 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> > > 14:13:53 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> > > 0x2f7fe76b0)
> > >
> > > Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
> > >
> > > File: mt.c Line: 2546
> > > 14:13:53 stack trace for pid 32162 written to
> > > /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > 14:13:53 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > 14:14:03 Starting crash time check of:
> > > 14:14:03 1. memory block headers
> > > 14:14:03 2. stacks
> > > 14:14:03 Found bad stack; mt_stack address:c0b24da0
> > > 14:14:03 mt.c, line 2546, thread 67767, proc id 32162,
> > > yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread 67767.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Saludos Cordiales
> > >
> > > Rubn Dutn
> > > Gerente
> > > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > > www.aplext.com
> > >
> > > El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 09:11 -0400, Art Kagel escribi:
> > > > Where did you see this? Was there any kind of Informix SQL or
> > > > ISAM
> > > > error
> > > > code?
> > > >
> > > > Art
> > > >
> > > > Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> > > > ASK Database Management
> > > > www.askdbmgt.com
> > > >
> > > > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> > > > opinions
> > > > and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with
> > > > which
> > > > I am
> > > > associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference.
> > > > Neither do
> > > > those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with
> > > > any
> > > > entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> > > > themselves.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ruben Dutan <
> > > > ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello
> > > > > Someone knows why this error happens
> > > > >
> > > > > Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds
> > > > > Thanks for your attention
> > > > > --
> > > > > Saludos Cordiales
> > > > >
> > > > > Rubn Dutn
> > > > > Gerente
> > > > > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > > > > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > > > > www.aplext.com
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > > believed to be clean.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > *****************************************************************
> > > > ****
> > > > **********
> > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > > > forum.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --001a11425fb4c1107305207df75e
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *****************************************************************
> > > > ****
> > > > **********
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > > forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > *********************************************************************
> > **********
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --001a1141e4c81fe9a0052080aa9b
> >
> >
> > *********************************************************************
> > **********
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
>
*******************************************************************************
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
--001a11425fb4d8efe00520869f16
Thanks
--
Saludos Cordiales
Rubén Dután
Gerente
APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
www.aplext.com
El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 19:31 -0400, Art Kagel escribió:
> Yes.
> On Sep 24, 2015 4:08 PM, "Ruben Dutan" <ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for you help but STACKSIZE is 512
> > You think that I must increase more
> > --
> > Saludos Cordiales
> >
> > Rubn Dutn
> > Gerente
> > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > www.aplext.com
> >
> > El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 12:24 -0400, Art Kagel escribi:
> > > Look at the messages about stack problems. Try increasing
> > > STACKSIZE> > > double
> > > and see if that will allow the engine to stay online. The default
> > > stack is
> > > only 64K. I increase that to 128 at almost all of my clients.
> > >
> > > Art
> > >
> > > Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> > > ASK Database Management
> > > www.askdbmgt.com
> > >
> > > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my own
> > > opinions
> > > and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization with
> > > which
> > > I am
> > > associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference.
> > > Neither do
> > > those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated with
> > > any
> > > entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> > > themselves.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Ruben Dutan <
> > > ruben.dutan@aplext.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Art
> > > >
> > > > When execute "onstat -"
> > > >
> > > > This is log message error
> > > > 14:13:43 Assert Failed: Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS,
> > > > Context:
> > > > mem
> > > > 14:13:43 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> > > > 14:13:43 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> > > > 0x2f7fe76b0)
> > > >
> > > > Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
> > > >
> > > > File: mtex.c Line: 416
> > > > 14:13:43 Action: Please notify IBM Informix Technical Support.
> > > > 14:13:43 stack trace for pid 32162 written to
> > > > /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > > 14:13:43 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > > 14:13:53 Exception Caught. Type: MT_EX_OS, Context: mem
> > > > 14:13:53 Assert Failed: yield_processor: Stack overflow in
> > > > thread
> > > > 67767
> > > > 14:13:53 IBM Informix Dynamic Server Version 11.70.FC8XBL
> > > > 14:13:53 Who: Session(1759, vicentel@comandat-ae0d6e, 4012,
> > > > 0x2f7fe76b0)
> > > >
> > > > Thread(67767, sqlexec, 2f03afb28, 12)
> > > >
> > > > File: mt.c Line: 2546
> > > > 14:13:53 stack trace for pid 32162 written to
> > > > /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > > 14:13:53 See Also: /informix/tmp/af.c9ff9e6
> > > > 14:14:03 Starting crash time check of:
> > > > 14:14:03 1. memory block headers
> > > > 14:14:03 2. stacks
> > > > 14:14:03 Found bad stack; mt_stack address:c0b24da0
> > > > 14:14:03 mt.c, line 2546, thread 67767, proc id 32162,
> > > > yield_processor: Stack overflow in thread 67767.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Saludos Cordiales
> > > >
> > > > Rubn Dutn
> > > > Gerente
> > > > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > > > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > > > www.aplext.com
> > > >
> > > > El jue, 24-09-2015 a las 09:11 -0400, Art Kagel escribi:
> > > > > Where did you see this? Was there any kind of Informix SQL or
> > > > > ISAM
> > > > > error
> > > > > code?
> > > > >
> > > > > Art
> > > > >
> > > > > Art S. Kagel, President and Principal Consultant
> > > > > ASK Database Management
> > > > > www.askdbmgt.com
> > > > >
> > > > > Blog: http://informix-myview.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > > Disclaimer: Please keep in mind that my own opinions are my
> > > > > own
> > > > > opinions
> > > > > and do not reflect on the IIUG, nor any other organization
> > > > > with
> > > > > which
> > > > > I am
> > > > > associated either explicitly, implicitly, or by inference.
> > > > > Neither do
> > > > > those opinions reflect those of other individuals affiliated
> > > > > with
> > > > > any
> > > > > entity with which I am affiliated nor those of the entities
> > > > > themselves.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ruben Dutan <
> > > > > ruben.dutan@aplext.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello
> > > > > > Someone knows why this error happens
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Error: Generic System Block: -1 seconds
> > > > > > Thanks for your attention
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Saludos Cordiales
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rubn Dutn
> > > > > > Gerente
> > > > > > APLEXT CIA. LTDA.
> > > > > > Soluciones AX-ERP & TIC
> > > > > > www.aplext.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > > > believed to be clean.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > *************************************************************
> > > > > ****
> > > > > ****
> > > > > **********
> > > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the
> > > > > > discussion
> > > > > > forum.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --001a11425fb4c1107305207df75e
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > *************************************************************
> > > > > ****
> > > > > ****
> > > > > **********
> > > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > > > forum.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > believed to be clean.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > *****************************************************************
> > > ****
> > > **********
> > > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > > forum.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --001a1141e4c81fe9a0052080aa9b
> > >
> > >
> > > *****************************************************************
> > > ****
> > > **********
> > > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion
> > > forum.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> > Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
> >
> >
>
> --001a11425fb4d8efe00520869f16
>
>
> *********************************************************************
> **********
> Forum Note: Use "Reply" to post a response in the discussion forum.
>
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.