Re: Future of SE ?

Posted in 2000

mars1972@my-deja.com — Tue, 01 Aug 2000 13:09:16 GMT — source: Informix-list mailing list archive (1991-1998)

In article <3986baa8.77708569@comino-leeds>, sally.woolrich@comino.com (Sally Woolrich) wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 15:56:49 +0100, "Christophe MAUMONT" > <informatique@univitis.fr> wrote: > > > What do you think INFORMIX will do with SE (standard engine) ? Will they > >continue to support it, to devellope it ? Should we migrate to on-line or > >dynamic server ? > > SE is enough for our needs, it is cheaper than dynamic server and > >doesn't need administration. > > This is a rather optimistic statement IMHO! SE databases still need > backing up (which I count as administration) and of course any > problems need sorting out. > Problems? Backups? I think you're on the wrong newsgroup... :) ... optimism? > > I'm alone to do every thing, analysing > >,programming , teaching the users ... (I don't wash the floor but ...), so I > >wouldn't like to have to administrate our bases. > > > > -- # unrm / ksh: unrm: not found # man cpio Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Before you buy.