RE: News Group vs Email Responses (was Re: DESC TABLE <table> does seem to word with ODBC)
Enough already.....can we block this "user"? -----Original Message----- From: Data Goob [mailto:datagoob@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:20 AM To: informix-list@iiug.org Subject: Re: News Group vs Email Responses (was Re: DESC TABLE <table> does seem to word with ODBC) Where can I buy an Informix prayer rug so I can pay proper hommage to the gods? ( As usual more time was spent on this than the original problem. ) If you want to ignore no-spam email addresses, who cares, do so, but don't go out of your way to tell people your arrogant contempt over something so petty, as if you are all that, it makes you look really self-absorbed, self-important and pompous. A few keyclicks jesus, how difficult is that. Like the world will end if you don't spend those extra few seconds of time to edit an address. You really need to get some perspective if THAT is a problem. By any standard I would have to think you've lost perspective. If you don't get it it doesn't matter, my opinion is as valid as anyone elses. "Enor Mouspenis" <enormouspenis@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c4jo3q$2iubpt$1@ID-64669.news.uni-berlin.de... > Data Goob wrote: > > > I'm not trampling on your emminences, just challenging mere mortals on > > what I think looks a bit pompous to the casual observer. Peacocks by > > their nature like to strut their stuff and flash their feathers, typically > > unaware of their bad behavior. I'm just challenging their behavior not > > their expertise. So calm down, eat a doughnut, and lighten up. It's just > > a newsgroup, it's just Informix, not church--or maybe...hmmmmm..... > > You is correct -- is human nature to see yourself as better than other > people because they not behave as you or not see thinks your way. Is quite > wrong for person helping someone to ask for life to be make easier and he > must jump over all hoop because Data Goob say so. Wishes of person asking > question much more important than of person answering. Infact, wishes of > Data Goob more important than anyone. Data Goob has time to do whatever > anyone ask and also answer more question than all others, so he must be > right and everyone else must also have time to do this. Jonathon and Art > are foolish and waste everyone time on this. No one is allowed to want to > do things another way when Data Goob not happy. Also, all internet people > must behave in same way, no freedom of the one allowed here. > > Thank you for convincimg me of this. > > -- > Enor sending to informix-list
I don't like his name either but what can you do? It's the internet, just about anything goes, and people have phallic obsessions, even using their names to suggest things. "Dale Gilbert" <dgilbert@nationalclearing.com> wrote in message news:c4kaci$196$1@terabinaries.xmission.com... > > Enough already.....can we block this "user"? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Data Goob [mailto:datagoob@hotmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 5:20 AM > To: informix-list@iiug.org > Subject: Re: News Group vs Email Responses (was Re: DESC TABLE <table> > does seem to word with ODBC) > > > Where can I buy an Informix prayer rug so I can pay proper hommage to the gods? > ( As usual more time was spent on this than the original problem. ) > > If you want to ignore no-spam email addresses, who cares, do so, but > don't go out of your way to tell people your arrogant contempt over something > so petty, as if you are all that, it makes you look really self-absorbed, > self-important and pompous. A few keyclicks jesus, how difficult is that. > Like the world will end if you don't spend those extra few seconds of time > to edit an address. You really need to get some perspective if THAT is a > problem. By any standard I would have to think you've lost perspective. If > you don't get it it doesn't matter, my opinion is as valid as anyone elses. > > "Enor Mouspenis" <enormouspenis@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:c4jo3q$2iubpt$1@ID-64669.news.uni-berlin.de... > > Data Goob wrote: > > > > > I'm not trampling on your emminences, just challenging mere mortals on > > > what I think looks a bit pompous to the casual observer. Peacocks by > > > their nature like to strut their stuff and flash their feathers, typically > > > unaware of their bad behavior. I'm just challenging their behavior not > > > their expertise. So calm down, eat a doughnut, and lighten up. It's just > > > a newsgroup, it's just Informix, not church--or maybe...hmmmmm..... > > > > You is correct -- is human nature to see yourself as better than other > > people because they not behave as you or not see thinks your way. Is quite > > wrong for person helping someone to ask for life to be make easier and he > > must jump over all hoop because Data Goob say so. Wishes of person asking > > question much more important than of person answering. Infact, wishes of > > Data Goob more important than anyone. Data Goob has time to do whatever > > anyone ask and also answer more question than all others, so he must be > > right and everyone else must also have time to do this. Jonathon and Art > > are foolish and waste everyone time on this. No one is allowed to want to > > do things another way when Data Goob not happy. Also, all internet people > > must behave in same way, no freedom of the one allowed here. > > > > Thank you for convincimg me of this. > > > > -- > > Enor > > > > > sending to informix-list