Re: poor performance revisted
From: mars1972@my-deja.com
>
>In article <8m62mq$87m$1@news.xmission.com>,
> "Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: "Ty O'Kelly" <tokelly@maxor.invalid.com>
> > >
> > >Obnoxio The Clown wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > >onstat -P | tail -5:> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >Percentages:
> > > > > > >Data 6.77
> > > > > > >Btree 92.40
> > > > > > >Other 0.82
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This looks ugly. What is the output of
> > > > > >
> > > > > > onstat -B | grep " d0 " | wc -l> > > > >
> > > > > 0
> > > >
> > > > Hmmmm...what's the smiley for raised eyebrows.
> > >
> > >So is there need for concern when that command returns 0? What does
> > >this mean?
> > >The FM has shed little light on the output onstat -B.
> >
> > No, it's just that the LRU prioritisation bug generally has squillions
>of
> > records with a d0 page type. So I'm surprised that you seem to have
>all the
> > symptoms of it, bar this one.
> >
>
>How much is a squillion? Is that a million times a squirrel?
Carlos! Where are you?
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com