On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, David Williams wrote:
> In article <Pine.BSF.3.91.970616095226.27401C-100000@kilimanjaro.dallas.
> herald.net>, Richard Stanford <richards@herald.net.REMOVE> writes
>
> >We've found the "known bug" in 5.05 that can corrupt archives. Why Informix
> >won't send out alerts on things like this... Aargh. But that's another rant
> >entirely.
> >
> There is an alert on the Techinfo Centre within their Web site. You
> need a valid Mainline SUpport ontrat to gain access to it though..
Just how clueless do I seem? There are a grand total of eighteen (18) alerts
on this system, dating back BEFORE 6/1/95, with the most recent being 4/1/97.
That's less than one a month. Unless you're looking at a different alert
section than I am?
For data integrety issues, though, a mailing-list would be nice as well,
rather than a demand-only web format. 'though at their frequency, it doesn't
make much difference. Did I mention that, of those 18, 3 of the "alerts"
are new version announcements and one of the remainder is a Techinfo
message? That makes 14 real alerts in two years.
[ker-snip]
> I meant upgrade a test machine to the latest version and see if you
> can still reproduce the problem, you will never get a fix unless you
> upgrade...
Not true -- while its akin to pulling teeth, we have been able to get patches
out of Informix in the past. For this problem, we probably will go to 5.08
though. Like I mentioned last time, proving that the known problem is fixed
is the easy part, attempting to verify that no others have been introduced is
difficult.
-Richard