RE: Identification Number

--- "Agnew, Doug" <dagnew@charlottepipe.com> > wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Obnoxio The Clown [mailto:obnoxio@hotmail.com] >Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 1:43 PM >To: dagnew@charlottepipe.com; informix-list@iiug.org >Subject: Re: Identification Number > > >From: "Doug Agnew" <dagnew@charlottepipe.com> >> >>"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message >>news:8tae42$jjg$1@news.xmission.com... >> > >> > From: "Impy" <wlinden@stritch.edu> >> > > >> > >"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > >news:8t9shm$e96$1@news.xmission.com... >> > > > >> > > > From: "Impy" <wlinden@stritch.edu> >> > > > > >> > > > >"Obnoxio The Clown" <obnoxio@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> > > > >news:8t9joc$bla$1@news.xmission.com... >> > > > > > >> > > > > > From: "Impy" <wlinden@stritch.edu> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >He has a group number member? Why didn't I get a number? Should > >>I >> > >post >> > > > >a >> > > > > > >message here requesting a number? I want a number, too! >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I've already got your number, baby! :-) >> > > > >> > > > >Can I count on that? >> > > > >> > > > You can dig-it, baby. >> > >Well, I figure'd you'd say sum-thing like that! >> > >> > I can't add to that. >>> > >>> >>>So, you bit off more than you can chew, huh?? > >>Ah, byte me. > >Your suggestion leaves me googol-eyed and perplexed.... As a matter of >fact, you might even call me googol-plexed. > >But then, we've always had a difference of opinion. So, quit trying to RAM >your ideas down my throat and I'll quit busing your chips. DRAM it, there I >go again. How will we ever achieve parity in this conversation? A sick lick, Elroy. Done dancing, Chuck? == Maintainer of the procrastinator's FAQ. Well, maybe tomorrow I will be. _____________________________________________________________ Want a new web-based email account ? ---> http://www.firstlinux.net