Re: Level - 0 Restore problems
Posted in 2000
"Art S. Kagel" wrote:
>
> Watawinona@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > Mark,
> >
> > we could talk in deep, dark tones about why a level 0 from one machine to
> > another is not a good idea. And many a newbie tries that now and then, and
> > fails just as the idiots before him.
> >
> > There are other, more suitable tools designed just for that purpose. So use
> > them. And don't wolf about things you don't know anything about.
>
> Sorry Nona, there is nothing inherently BAD or 'bad idea' about restoring
> from one machine to another. Indeed I depend on that capability to
> maintain a sane backup strategy in the face of servers that take over 24
> hours to archive. We archive sister machines on a rotating schedule so that
> I always have a current level 0 from one and level 0 plus level 1 from the
> other. I keep the disk layouts compatible (I try to keep them identical
> but that never seems to work) so that I can restore one set to the other
> machine if that is the faster solution holding the two tape set restore in
> reserve in case the tapes turn out to be bad. This has worked for me and
> for my predecessor for eight years and I'm still working here!
>
Same here. That's how I can cut over a 20G Informix instance in about 4
or 5 hours. Identical logical layouts, all required ONCONFIG parameters
are the same, and even using lowly ontape. That's a lot better (and
faster) than export / import, even with HPL.
> The problem is that the disk layouts have to be compatible, which is easy
> if you are running only one instance per machine, meaning all devices are
> the same size or if larger on one system that the instance ONLY utilizes
> the smaller size on both systems letting the difference go to waste.
>
Agreed. The logical layout compatability is required.
> Mark is right, and obviously one word to you was not sufficient so here
> were a few hundred. Your one liners are not useful or helpful and, unless
> appended or prepended to a functional answer, neither appreciated nor cute.
>
Unless it actually answers the question . . . . which most didn't.
--
John Carlson
Informix DBA
WHSmith USA
#include std_disclaimer.h /* These are my opinions, not my company's
opinion */