curtis@pencom.com (Curtis Preston) writes:
>In article
><Pine.BSF.3.91.970617132753.4700C-100000@kilimanjaro.dallas.herald.net>,
>From Richard Stanford <richards@herald.net.REMOVE>, the following was
>written: > And at least one problem -- you can't run logging again
>without > changing the > tape. For that reason, something that ejects
>the current tape and > spawns continuous logging might be best, then
>your operators wouldn't > be overwriting log tapes.
>
>Problems like this one, and restarting logs after reboot are all why I
>do logs to disk. I have a script that does this automatically, just ask
>if you want it.
Hold on - you mean to say that if a continuous log backup is left
running, it will just keep overwriting from the beginning of the tape
each time it has a log to back up? If that's true, what was the point
of including this feature in the first place? That doesn't make any
sense!
-- Cos (Ofer Inbar) -- cos@leftbank.com cos@cs.brandeis.edu
-- The Left Bank Operation -- lbo@leftbank.com http://www.leftbank.com/
"Good literature is about Love and War."
"Junk fiction is about Sex and Violence."