"Beta Computers"Bio
Threads
- Re: It's incredible
- Re: Informix 7.X and RAID 5
- Querix another 4gl to 'c' product.
- Jobs in the U.K.
- Re: SQL from the command line
- Re: Seek Info for Jobs in THAILAND
- Re: dbexport/dbimport problems
- Re: 25544 The sqlexecd daemon cannot get a host structure.: No Error
- Re: Debugger & Arguments
- Re: CLOSE and FREE
- Re: SCO and libsocket.a
- Re: Systables.npused < 0
- Re: CLOSE and FREE
- Re: SCO and libsocket.a
- Re: Systables.npused < 0
- Re: Systables.npused < 0
- Re: Pension Fund Administration
- Re: Unsatisified symbols
- Re: -218 error
- Re: Problem with SP
- Re: comp.databases.kerry.sainsbury and tbtape question
- Re: Inet, err -932 , WSAENOBUFFS
- Re: default exit behaviour?
- Re: Informix SE to Online problem
- Re: Shelling out of isql?
- Re: Informix on MPP systems
- Re: Export/Import Database - Help??
- Re: Size of database in Raw Partition
- re: SE v2 upgrade to v5/v6 - views sought
- Re: dbspaces' list. Is it a problem?
- Re: OnLine shared memory question
- Re: new era
- Re: Export/Import Database - Help??
- Re: from SE to Online: Experience??
- Re: online 6.0 installation on Sparc 2.3
- Re: Rule of Thumb for Database Size ?
- Re: tape error
- Re: Error code -567
- Re: Informix Online 5.0
- Re: rowid (faking)
- Re: Need your opinions.
- Re: [Q] How to get rid of error message: -4518 temprorary string space
- Re: ESQL/C prob with "INFORMIXSERVER"
- Re: Reading from 9 track tape
- Re: Query Optimisation on SE 5.0
- Re: Informix Locking Problem
- Re: Shareware like I-Net
- Re: Need On-Line and SQL????
- Re: Ordering data regardless of case
- Re: sub query in sql update
- Re: Any bugs in 5.02.UC2 for AIX 3.2.5?
- Re: Informix Gateways to other RDMS
- Re: Data Modeling
- Re: ONLINE 6.0 vs 5.0 and other issues
- Re: Cost-based Optimizers
- Re: First-Hand Experience with RAIDS?
- Re: ESQL/C - Reuse a Cursor?
- Re: Shared memory problem on SCO UNIX 3.2v4
- Re: ERROR -457,I can't find it
- Re: View Management Tools
- Re: updating TEXT data
- Re: tbtape and cron files
- Re: Contruct statement - field buffer